I’ve had a few moments to spend some time going through my google reader and watch the twitter world – even participated once or twice and had a few conversations! One thing that caught my attention this past evening was a discussion about the GTA for Administrators that is being held San Antonio, Texas right before the ASCD national conference. Now, I took some time to read through Miguel’s thoughts then ventured over to David Jakes, Mark Wagner, Daniel Rezac and Kevin Jarrett’s blogs to see what they had to say on the subject. Although it might be great to enter the discussion about what the Academy should or should not be or the different pro’s and con’s of badges on blogs and what they represent, I’m going to, in my own fashion, wander away and look at this a bit differently.
I AM AN ADMINISTRATOR
We’re a rare breed, those of us who decide to sit as neither teacher nor central office staff. As schools have progressed over time and grew larger, there became a need, for some reason, for there to be a person who oversaw the whole enterprise at each location, the Head Teacher idea. Some are very good at what they do and, well, some aren’t and really shouldn’t be there but that is no different than any other profession in the world. In fact, if you were to look, there are many people who don’t particularly like their superiors – btw I didn’t google this but kind of gleaned it from reading many issues of Men’s Health and listening to what others say in various social gatherings. Principals, being in that position, usually receive a fair amount of criticism for their decisions and/or intelligence.
Now, as someone who’s been doing this for, well, really, only 10 years, not very long if you think about it but here I am, I have picked up a few things along the way. The one thing that I have come to understand is that unless you have been a principal, you don’t know what you are talking about. Period. You can guess and you can make calculated assumptions but, at the end of the day, you don’t know.
Also, not all princpals have no clue about technology or pedagogy or all those other things that they seem not to know anything about. Here’s my example from what I do right now. I sit as a vice-principal in a 8 – 12 highschool. It’s not large by US standards but it’s a decent size. There are 3 of us in our team – two of whom teach about 50% each. So, we have 2 full time bodies. This is my first year in the school and any ideas I had of making changes in the way of classroom innovations or such went out the window on day 3. The first 2 were inservice days. Why? Because reality smacked me upside the head. You see, as a public institution, we can’t pick our students, interview them, ask for a background or whatever some other schools do. We get whomever comes through the door and we have do work with them, trying to create and provide educational opportunities for them. We also don’t get to select the teachers all the time. You see, as a larger school, we sometimes have teachers assigned to us when they don’t fit in other schools. Yes, read between the lines! Because we are the largest school in our division, there is a sense, real or not, that the school needs to meet certain expectations and achieve at particular levels which aren’t always happening.
To add to this, we have a new set of curricula in all our middle years classes that will need to be fully implemented in the next 3 years and new curricula coming for all our senior classes beginning next year and continuing for the next 2 years. Our math program is completely changing next year but we haven’t seen the new curriculum. We also have a few division initiatives in the Reading, Math and Assessment areas plus some real pressure coming for DI across the grade levels. We’re into year 4 of our PLC’s that has really only been moving along for 2. There are also a number of other things, like a new SDS coming online, new financial software that the school and SCC are learning and that’s not including any of the extra-curricular that some of us do.
That’s a small snapshot of some of the things that, as an administrator, I work with each day. But, that’s only the non-student side of what happens. You’re right, there isn’t one mention of technology or the sort. Why you ask? Because the reality is that in order to swim, you have to have water. Right now, we have no water. It’s not that we don’t have technology in our school – in fact we have SMART boards in almost each classroom and many of our teachers use them every day – heck I use them when I’m in a classroom that has one – I get shuffled from classroom to classroom depending on which one is open during that period.
So, when a discussion starts about administrators needing to have a better understanding of the tools or needing to know what teachers’ can do with them or how they will improve teaching or…. I begin to tune out. You see, like David Jakes, I’m an administrator every day. Unlike David, I work in isolation with little to no support for innovation or a vision of what might be to come. So, I see this from a bit of a different perspective – I don’t need any of the Academy training – not that it wouldn’t be a great learning experience or wouldn’t give me all kinds of great ideas or wouldn’t help to give me insights to what others are doing or help me build my PLN but, once I returned, I’d be facing what I face now because much of society still sees education as what it was not what it could be which influences the decisions being made many different levels and leaves administrators like me, well, I’m not sure where……
I blog, I know about enought tools and how they could enhance learning, I’ve started nings, done wikis, set up school-wide learning sessions, done tutorials, created and presented and all the while getting no where. Maybe it’s my presentation……..
That’s the Crux
You see, knowing all this stuff is really cool but, it’s just stuff. Being an agent of change may seem like a great martyrdom thing in a system but, after awhile it, well, becomes old and, after being publicly humilated a few times for “improper technology use”, one sees that being an agent of change isn’t very glamorous and can be determental to your career.
You see, now I spend my time working with kids with ODD, ADHD and a whole host of other learning disabilities using RIT, trying to work with parents to move things along so that we can establish some sort of program so that their child can, in fact, remain in a classroom without ending up out of the classroom.
I know you can’t change things overnight but, really, how long are we going to wait? We really began to discuss this when my oldest daughter was in grade 6. She’s graduating now and we haven’t moved – really. One teacher at a time is a great slogan but if it’s not my child’s teacher, we’ve a problem Houston! You see, my oldest son is in grade 3 and we aren’t changing – we’re still doing worksheet after worksheet and, because we can find different ones on different teacher sites, we’re calling it progress! Yes there are great examples of individual teachers but, at this rate, my 6 month old son will have graduated before we really begin to see any systemic change.
Solutions Anyone?
I do have one. We need to change those people who are making the decisions at the top level. Yeah, easier said than done. Or is it? You see, I agree with Principalspage idea that significant change is coming. Either we figure out how to bring about some significant change or it will happen to us. For administrators like me, it will only be a matter of time before we see even more responsibility handed over. In my own province I can see the tides already turning. We’re seeing a greater emphasis on province wide testing with a comparison of results that, in some loose manner, might be tied to funding. Heck, the major city schools divisions are beginning to be scrutinized about graduation rates. Change is coming. We need leaders who will be able to move things in a different way. Telling them about the tools may give them some understanding, showing them how teachers use the tools may give them some information, connecting them with others who are the same may give them some support but we need to have leaders who have the time and energy to lead in ways that will bring about real change.
So David and Mark and all those others who have commented, although I see the Academy being a great learning experience, I don’t see it having a real impact for change in education or in the educational world I inhabit. We somehow need to have leaders who will make hard decisions about what the future of our schools will look like. Are we the last stop for all society’s woes or are schools more? I’m hoping for “more” for my childrens’ sake!